Induction-Module Development![]() Pulser design involves a trade-off between
flexibility and cost. For a fusion driver,
pulsers should ideally have high peak power, a 5-10 Hz
repetition rate, agile waveform control, and a
production cost less than $20/J. The least
expensive type of pulser consists of a passive
pulse-forming network (PFN) switched by a
sparkgap. This type of pulser, however, has poor
waveform control and a relatively short spark-gap
lifetime (~105 shots). Replacing the
spark gap with a thyratron increase the lifetime
(~106 - 107shots), but the cost
is substantially higher, and there is still little
wavefrorm flexibility. Solid-state pulser are
being studied, despite their even higher cost, because
they offer high reliability and long liftetime, as well
as allowing programmable waveforms. Under a
small-business research contract, Diversified Technologies
has investigated the use of low-inductance
Insulated-Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) for
switching, followed by magnetic pulse compression, and
has reported that such a hybrid system could meet
the performance requirements of a fusion
driver. Also, on a separate small-business
contract, First Point Scientific is developing a
solid-state pulser which will add corrections with a
voltage up to 20 kV to waveforms generated by more
traditional pulsers, allowing more accurate control of
the beam longitudinal profile. When complete,
this pulser will be tested on HCX.
Research into core materials and fabrication
techniques is being carried out in parallel with pulser
design. During the last five years, many
amorphous and nanocrystalline iron-based alloys have
been tested for their magnetic properties, uniformity,
and ease of fabrication. To minimize losses,
cores made from these materials must be built up in
thin (~2 x 10-5 m) layers, and each layer
must be insultated to prevent current flow across
them. Cores are typically fabricated by casting
or rolling the material into a thin ribbon, coating it
with insulation, and winding the ribbon onto a
spool. At present, amorphous materials are the
least expensive, but available insulating materials
that can survive the annealling process are either too
thick, degrade performance, or do not hold sufficient
voltage. Silicon steel is more expensive and has
high losses, but it is an alternative for longer pulse
durations due to its higher magnetic-flux swing.
Nanocrystalline steel is also more expensive than
amorphous materials and produces a lower voltage for a
given core size, but it is attractive for applications
where low core losses are important.
For comments or questions contact WMSharp@lbl.gov or DPGrote@lbl.gov. Work described here was supported by the Office of Fusion Energy at the US Department of Energy under contracts DE-AC03-76SF00098 and W-7405-ENG-48. This document was last revised June, 2002. |